Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Primus, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Primus, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

An unlabeled antibody method using glucose oxidase-antiglucose oxidase complexes (GAG): a sensitive alternative to immunoperoxidase for the detection of tissue antigens

CA Clark, EC Downs and FJ Primus

Immunoenzyme staining for tissue antigens using glucose oxidase as marker enzyme was compared with immunoperoxidase techniques. Both the indirect, conjugated antibody method and the unlabeled antibody procedure employing preformed complexes of glucose oxidase-antiglucose oxidase (GAG) and peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) were used to stain carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in paraffin tissue sections. The localization of CEA within a tissue specimen was the same in all cases, and background staining was minimal. The percentage of positive specimens detected with GAG and PAP was similar but was slightly greater with glucose oxidase compared to peroxidase conjugates. The glucose oxidase conjugates and GAG were similar to the comparable immunoperoxidase reagents in enzyme-antibody molar ratio, retention of antibody and enzyme activity, immunohistochemical staining dilutions, and stability. Immunoglucose oxidase and immunoperoxidase were combined to localize CEA and colon-specific antigen-p simultaneously. Excellent contrast and staining separation were shown between the enzymatic reaction products of the two systems. Since immunoglucose oxidase methods are as sensitive as the comparable immunoperoxidase techniques, they should be considered as a reliable alternative to the latter, especially when endogenous peroxidase activity may be a problem. Furthermore, the two methods can be conveniently combined for the simultaneous detection of two antigens.

Volume 30, Issue 1, pp. 27-34, 01/01/1982
Copyright © 1982 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1982