Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haftek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thivolet, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haftek, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thivolet, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Quantitative studies of keratin expression with the post-embedding immunogold labeling method

M Haftek, MC Chignol and J Thivolet

CNRS UA 601, INSERM U 209, Clinique Dermatologique, Hopital E. Herriot, Lyon, France.

Immunoreactivity of the 56.5 KD acidic (type I) keratin was localized ultrastructurally and quantified in normal human epidermis using the specific monoclonal antibody KL1 and post-embedding immunogold labeling. The protein was detected in keratin intermediate filament bundles of all suprabasal keratinocytes. Keratohyalin granules and desmosomal plaques were labeled only on the periphery, in regions where keratin filaments penetrate these structures. The 56.5 KD keratin immunoreactivity increased from the first suprabasal layer onwards and reached its maximum in the outmost spinous layer. A subsequent abrupt decrease of the specific immunogold labeling was observed in the granular layer. This low reactivity, which persisted also in the horny layer, may be partially explained by either protein degradation or masking of the antigenic sites by a filament-aggregating material occurring at these stages of keratinocyte terminal differentiation. Statistical comparison of the quantitative results obtained in various cell and tissue compartments revealed no significant differences between the background labeling levels observed in the basal layer of epidermis with KL1, a control monoclonal antibody, or the immunogold conjugate alone. Our results confirm the specificity of 56.5 KD keratin for terminally differentiating suprabasal keratinocytes and demonstrate the importance of appropriate control studies when a post-embedding immunogold labeling method is employed.

Volume 37, Issue 5, pp. 735-741, 05/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1989