Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry Priciples for Free Access to Science
  Search:   
    >> Advanced Search

Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stirling, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stirling, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Use of tannic acid and silver enhancer to improve staining for electron microscopy and immunogold labeling

JW Stirling

Department of Histopathology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia.

Staining by uranyl acetate and lead citrate (UA-LC) of immunolabeled sections of unfixed glomerular basement membrane (GBM) digests embedded in low-acid glycol methacrylate (LA-GMA) is poor. The following were investigated for their ability to enhance contrast when applied to sections before UA-LC: potassium permanganate, phosphotungstic acid, gold chloride, osmium tetroxide, glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide, colloidal gold-silver enhancer, tannic acid, and glutaraldehyde-tannic acid. Silver enhancer (2 min incubation, no sodium thiosulfate step) gave dense GBM staining but not with immunogold labeling. Silver enhancer is recommended as a simple alternative to routine silver stains but not for contrast enhancement with immunogold labeling. Tannic acid (1% for 1 min or 0.005% for 10 sec) and glutaraldehyde (2.5% for 5 min) followed by tannic acid enhanced contrast and, when applied after immunolabeling, did not appear to affect probe levels. Tannic acid also enhanced the staining of fixed tissue in LR Gold acrylic resin and LA-GMA, but not of glutaraldehyde-osmium-fixed tissue in epoxy resin, even after sodium metaperiodate treatment. Treatment of sections with tannic acid is recommended for contrast enhancement in immunogold studies when osmium and tannic acid post-fixation must be avoided and the tissue is embedded in methacrylate or acrylic resin.

Volume 41, Issue 4, pp. 643-648, 04/01/1993
Copyright © 1993 by The Histochemical Society


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





Guidelines | Subscriptions | About | exPRESS - Current - Archive | Business Information | Contact
The Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry is owned, published, and licensed by The Histochemical Society © 1993