|
|
|
|
 |
|||
|
|||
ARTICLE |
Immunohistochemical Localization of Lipocortin 1 in Rat Brain Is Sensitive to pH, Freezing, and Dehydration
James A. McKannaa and Ming-Zhi Zhangaa Department of Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
Correspondence to: James A. McKanna, Dept. of Cell Biology, Vanderbilt Univ., Nashville, TN 37232.
 |
Summary |
|---|
 Top Summary IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Lipocortin 1 (LC1, annexin 1) has received considerable attention as a substrate for protein kinases, as a Ca++- and phosphatidylserine-binding protein, and as a mediator of glucocorticoid anti-inflammatory effects. However, there has been confusion over localization of LC1 immunoreactivity (LC1-ir), which reportedly localizes to neurons and/or to astrocytes or microglia in rat brain. To test whether these contradictory data arise from unusual properties of the antigen, we developed a novel brain slice model to determine fixation and staining variables. The specificity of anti-LC1 sera was ensured by pre-absorption and affinity purification with immobilized recombinant LC1. Specific LC1-ir was detected in ramified microglia of brains perfused with acidified aldehydes and embedded in paraffin. However, commonly used immunohistochemical procedures have unexpected profound effects. LC1-ir was eliminated by fixation with neutral/alkaline aldehydes, by freezing before strong acid-aldehyde fixation, or by staining without partial de/rehydration before the primary serum. The sensitivity of LC1 epitopes to proton and water activities may reflect molecular properties important to LC1's roles in vivo. True LC1-ir was not detected in normal neurons or astrocytes. (J Histochem Cytochem 45:527-538, 1997)
Key Words: lipocortin, annexin, microglia, astrocytes, neurons
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Lipocortin 1 (LC1), a Ca++-binding protein with phospholipase A2 inhibitory activity, was purified by 
Annexin research has been unusually controversial (reviewed by
As a possible key to the functions of EGF in situ, we have studied immunohistochemical localization of LC1 in embryonic development and in pathophysiological responses (
In other hands, the conditions we found unacceptable reportedly preserved LC1-ir in interesting loci. For example, the literature contains uncontested reports that LC1 in rat brain localizes to neurons and/or to astrocytes or microglia (
Assuming that the conflicting results were unlikely to be due to mere error, we hypothesized that they might reflect interesting and unusual properties of the antigen, as suggested from other disciplines. Biochemical studies detected Ca++-dependent and Ca++-independent binding of LC1 to membranes (
To investigate the effects of fixatives and histological protocols on LC1 and its antigenic epitopes, we developed a novel brain slice model system and used it to test more than 200 procedural variables. For example, slices can be rapidly transferred from one solution to another, or frozen, heated, or cooled, in elaborate sequences with excellent reproducibility. A thorough series of experiments using slices demonstrated that some common immunohistochemical methods, including freezing for cryosectioning, fixation with neutral aldehydes, and dehydration of the tissue, can cause profound and unexpected changes in LC1 immunoreactivity.
Because antibody specificity was a critical factor, we used LC1 from both natural and recombinant sources for pre-absorption controls and affinity purification of our anti-LC1 sera. The results strongly indicate that LC1 in normal rat brain is restricted to and characteristic of microglia.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Tissue Preparation
For optimal preservation of LC1-ir, adult Long-Evans rats were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and perfused transcardially with 50 ml of heparinized saline (0.9% NaCl + 0.02% NaNO2 + 500 IU heparin), followed by 250 ml of FPAS fixative delivered by a gravity head of 1-2 m over 15-20 min. FPAS (formalin-periodate-acetate-salt) contained final concentrations of 10% formalin (3.7% formaldehyde + 1.5% methanol), 10 mM sodium m-periodate, 40 mM phosphate buffer, 1% acetic acid, and 0.9% NaCl. Equivalent excellent preservation also was achieved with GPAS (2.5% glutaraldehyde + PAS as above).
Immediately after perfusion, brains were removed from the skull, cut coronally into 2-4-mm-thick blocks, and postfixed for 6 hr. The blocks were dehydrated through a 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95, 100% ethanol series and remained in absolute ethanol overnight at 4C. The following day they were vacuum-embedded in paraffin.
Immunohistochemistry
Sections 10 µm thick were mounted on glass slides, deparaffinized with xylenes, treated with 0.3% H2O2 in absolute methanol for 15 min to eliminate endogenous peroxidase, rehydrated through the ethanol series, and stained for immunohistochemical localization of LC1. After saturating nonspecific IgG binding sites with 10% goat serum in PBS (30 min), primary antiserum (rabbit) diluted 1:8000 in PBS + 1% goat serum was applied (overnight at 4C in a humid chamber). After washes in PBS (three times for 10 min), the bound rabbit immunoglobulins were localized with ABC Elite Vectastain reagents (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA) or LAB-SA (Zymed Laboratories; So. San Francisco, CA), using diaminobenzidine as chromogen. A light counterstain of Toluidine blue also was applied in most cases.
Cryosections
After fixation as above, brain blocks were rinsed in PBS, cryoprotected overnight with 25% sucrose in PBS, frozen, and cryosectioned at 10-20-µm thickness on a sliding microtome. In our standard protocol, staining of the sections (dried on slides and stored at -20C) began with initial dehydration through the series of ethanols to enter the protocol above at the H2O2-methanol step; i.e., before exposure to the primary antibody. This initial dehydration followed by rehydration is referred to as "DeRe."
Brain Slices
Because it would not be practical to use individual animals for the anticipated experiments with multiple fixatives and sequential methods, we tested brain slices as used for electrophysiology and pharmacology experiments (
|
Antisera
The most effective anti-LC1 serum tested to date is a polyclonal rabbit serum against LC1 antigen (
Antibody Specificity Controls
Lipocortin for pre-absorption controls was prepared as the Ca++-sensitive eluate from placental membranes (
For pre-absorption controls and affinity purification using the yeast as a substrate, recombinant and control yeast were fixed with GPAS, quenched with 0.1 M glycine in PBS, and frozen three times in this solution to perforate the cell walls. For each sample, 1 ml of packed yeast was incubated with 1 ml of anti-LC1 at 1:2000 dilution. After 2 hr the pre-absorbed supernatant was reserved and the yeast washed five times in PBS. Bound antibody was extracted by rapid mixing with 1 ml of 0.2 M HCl at pH 1.7 and sedimentation of the yeast. The supernatant was immediately pipetted into an equal volume of double-strength PBS, pH 7.9. The resulting solution had pH near neutrality and was used at full strength (with added 1% goat serum) for immunohistochemistry.
Quantitative Image Analysis
Density of the LC1-ir was analyzed using BIOQUANT computerized video image analysis systems (R&M Biometrics; Nashville, TN). Mean density on a scale of 0-255 was determined for >50 cells per specimen and was standardized as a percentage of the density range defined by the kidney specimen on the same slide. Because previous studies (
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Brain Slice Model
To determine whether immersion-fixation of brain slices could serve as a model system to investigate the preservation of LC1-ir, pilot experiments varied the fixatives and the interval between slicing and fixation. FPAS or GPAS, the "best" fixatives for perfusions, preserved strong LC1-ir (4+) in an extensive population of stellate glia immersion-fixed slices immediately (Figure 1B). To determine whether the speed of transfer from slicing bath to fixative affected LC1-ir, slices were incubated at 4C in the bath or at 37C in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) for 50 min before fixation. LC1-ir staining intensity was equivalent in control and incubated slices. Hemislices from the same brain processed in parallel revealed the effects of some elementary fixation variables (Figure 2). Some form of fixation was necessary; no LC1-ir (-) was preserved in slices placed immediately in the ethanol dehydration series or pickled for 5 hr in PAS, the acidified buffer containing no aldehydes.
|
The immunostained cells in the slices were morphologically characteristic of microglia, as shown previously for tissue sections (McKanna and Fedoroff 1996). They were distinct from and approximately half as numerous as astrocytes identified by S100-ß, they were dispersed (i.e., somata rarely contiguous), and they stained with other microglial markers, including GSA B4-isolectin and phosphotyrosine. In LC1-positive cells, the reaction product consistently filled the perinuclear cytoplasm and stained all the way to the tips of the ramifications (Figure 1C).
Penetration of the fixative into the slices appeared to be thorough and effective. Background immunoreactivity was very low in the median 
400 µm of the slice. However, zones at each surface of the slice (50 µm thick) stained more densely (Figure 1B). Close examination of these superficial zones revealed many stained particles 0.5-3 µm in diameter, suggesting vesiculation of microglial processes severed during slicing.
We concluded that brain slices immersed in acidified aldehyde fixatives, embedded in paraffin, and stained with anti-LC1 serum at 1:8000 dilution provided a useful model. Although periodate was not necessary in the fixatives, we used it routinely because it appeared to improve penetration in glycosylated tissues, such as brain and embryos. Because both FPAS and GPAS provided excellent preservation of LC1-ir, their composition was varied in subsequent experiments.
Fixative Variables and Freezing: Paraffin-embedded Tissue
pH.
Using the excellent preservation of LC1-ir (4+) by GPAS as control, we systematically studied the effects of pH in brain slices (Figure 2). To examine higher pH, the control fixative containing 1% acetic acid was neutralized with NaOH (1 N), essentially producing sodium acetate (160 mM). With neutral fixative (pH 7.0-7.2), LC1-ir was barely detectable (+/-) (Figure 1B, top). At slightly alkaline levels (above pH 7.5), LC1-ir disappeared (-) (Figure 1D, top). Identical results were obtained with fixatives buffered to pH 7.2 and 7.6 with 0.1 M phosphate.
To test whether the influence of pH on LC1-ir preservation depended strictly on proton activity (H+) or might also be affected by organic anions, a gallery of acids was investigated. At concentrations of 1-5%, formic, acetic, n-butyric, i-butyric, oxalic, cacodylic, tannic, and trichloroacetic acids at pH 3-5 were very effective in preserving LC1-ir (3+ or better). Even a simple concoction of 10% formalin combined with 0.9% NaCl and brought to pH 4 with HCl preserved LC1-ir well (3+). Although these experiments did not rule out the complex tissue anions generated when fixatives interact with brain, no requirement or preference for specific buffer anions was detected in the preservation of LC1-ir. With aldehyde fixatives, only proton levels appear to be important.
Aldehydes.
Because aldehyde fixation reactions reportedly are retarded under acidic conditions and accelerated under basic conditions (
|
Slices were pre-fixed with GPAS for 0 (control), 10, or 60 min, transferred to alkaline GPAS (raised to pH 7.6 with 1 N NaOH), and fixed for 6 hr, followed by paraffin embedding and processing for immunohistochemistry. The hypotheses predicted that LC1-ir would be absent from all three samples because, if aldehyde reactions were inhibited during the low-pH episode, then the important epitopes of the antigen would be available for destruction/blocking on transfer to pH 7.6.
The results were not consistent with the hypotheses. Fixation at pH 7.6 destroyed LC1-ir in the control (Figure 1D, top) and also in specimens that received only 10-min GPAS treatment. However, exposure to GPAS at pH 4 for 60 min preserved good LC1-ir (3+) despite subsequent treatment with pH 7.6 fixative for 5 hr (Figure 1D, bottom). Therefore, postfixation with glutaraldehyde at pH 7.6 eliminated LC1-ir from lightly fixed rat brain but did not touch it after 1 hr of fixation at pH 4. These results demonstrated that pre-fixation with aldehydes at low pH preserved LC1-ir and therefore indicated that the fixative reacted with the antigen under acidic conditions.
To test whether crosslinking at neutral/basic pH destroyed the LC1 antigenicity, slices were pre-fixed in neutral glutaraldehyde followed by GPAS at pH 4. The hypothesis predicted that the pre-fixation would seriously diminish LC1-ir. Control slices fixed in GP_S (pH 7.2) for 6 hr showed little LC1-ir (+/-) (Figure 1B, top); sister slices that spent sixty minutes in GP_S before transfer to GPAS for 5 hr displayed excellent LC1-ir (4+) (Figure 1B, bottom). Therefore, pre-fixation at neutral pH did not appear to destroy or irreversibly crosslink LC1, but acid fixation was required to preserve LC1 immunoreactivity.
If preservation of LC1-ir depended on suppression of formaldehyde reactivity at low pH, then fixation with aldehydes that are more reactive under acidic conditions should diminish LC1-ir. We tested glutaraldehyde, which reacts strongly at pH 4 (
Acid-Alcohol.
Because LC1-ir preserved with formaldehyde (4%) prepared fresh from paraformaldehyde was slightly less dense (3+) than that preserved by 10% formalin (3.7% formaldehyde + 1.5% methanol), alcohol was a variable of potential interest in fixatives. Traditional formulations of acid-alcohol (1-5% acetic acid + 70% ethanol) were negative or equivocal (+/-) for LC1-ir. Quite unexpectedly, however, lower concentrations of alcohol were effective. E20-AS (20% ethanol + 1% acetic acid + 0.9% salt) adequately preserved LC1-ir (3+) (Figure 4). Furthermore, the acetate was unnecessary; E30-HCl (30% ethanol taken to pH 4 with HCl) also preserved LC1-ir (3+). As shown in Figure 1C, raising the acetic acid to 5% (E20-A5S = 20% ethanol + 5% HAc + salt) gave even better preservation of LC1-ir (4+).
|
Although acid-alcohol fixatives preserved the LC1-positive cells and LC1-ir, they were far from ideal. The ground substance of these tissues was washed out and other antigens of interest (e.g., S100-ß, phosphotyrosine) were not preserved. Alcohol in the fixative did not substantially augment the immunoreactivity preserved by acidified aldehydes [adding 5-50% alcohol to F/GPAS did not change the expected maximal LC1-ir (4+)]. Furthermore, alcohol did not reverse the loss of LC1-ir with neutral/basic aldehyde fixatives.
Freezing Pre/Postfixation. Because low-affinity LC1-ir sites (demonstrable only with primary sera diluted 1:100) have been reported on neurons and astrocytes in cryosections of rat brain, we investigated the effects of freezing on LC1 immunolocalization (Figure 4). After fixation for 6 hr in GPAS or FPAS, slices were frozen, thawed, embedded in paraffin, and processed for LC1 IHC. Such pre-fixed slices displayed excellent LC1-ir (4+), demonstrating that freezing in itself does not destroy or translocate microglial LC1-ir. However, when slices were frozen before fixation (equivalent to preparing unfixed tissue for cryosectioning), LC1-ir was entirely absent (-).
To evaluate the time course of antagonism between freezing and fixation, slices were immersed in GPAS and allowed to remain at room temperature (RT) for staged periods of pre-fixation before freezing. The effects of pre-fixation on microglial staining were dose-dependent (Table 1). Somewhat surprisingly, however, staining of neurons and/or astrocytes was not detected in these experiments, even at serum dilutions of 1:100.
|
Cryosections
Hypothesizing that paraffin embedding might interfere with the low-affinity staining, we next examined cryosections. To confirm that LC1-ir survived the sucrose cryoprotection and freezing, residual blocks from the cryostat were thawed, embedded in paraffin, and stained. The levels of LC1-ir detected in these residual blocks (4+) were indistinguishable from control specimens that had been embedded in paraffin immediately after fixation. Furthermore, when the cryosections were stained with our standard protocol (see Materials and Methods), the serum at 1:8K dilution demonstrated strong (4+) LC1-ir (Figure 5A). Attempts to reproduce the low-affinity staining in these cryosections using primary serum at 1:100 dilution were negative; microglia were still the only cells showing DAB reaction product.
|
The low-affinity staining had been demonstrated with fluorescence methods that did not employ the graded DeRe steps of our standard protocol. Therefore, we investigated De Re as a variable in the preservation of LC1-ir. Cryosections of FPAS-fixed tissues taken directly to primary serum at 1:8K dilution (without DeRe) were almost devoid of staining, showing only equivocal LC1-ir (+/-) in microglia (Figure 5B). Transferring the specimen directly to absolute methanol (with or without H2O2), as often done for cryosections, improved LC1-ir only slightly (+). Full development of microglial LC1-ir appeared to required DeRe through a graded series of alcohols.
Neuron Staining. Because high-affinity staining apparently required exposure of the epitope to a hydrophobic environment, we investigated the influence of this factor on low-affinity staining. Without DeRe, cryosections displayed prominent neuron staining (3+) with primary serum at both 1:100 and 1:1K (Figure 6B and Figure 6D). It was reduced (2+) at 1:4K (Figure 7) and absent at 1:8K (-) (Figure 5B). As shown in Figure 8, without DeRe before primary serum, neuron staining always was apparent regardless of the quality of fixation. With DeRe, neuron staining was never observed in adequately fixed brain. Cryosections of unfixed or poorly fixed brain (immersed in neutral formalin for a few hours) displayed some neuron staining (+) even after DeRe.
|
Microglial staining showed an inverse but less rigorous dependence on DeRe (Figure 8). Even without alcohol exposure, strongly fixed (GPAS) specimens displayed partial staining of both microglial somata and neurons (3+); the microglial ramified processes were only lightly stained (Figure 6B and Figure 6D). Adjacent cryosections treated briefly with 30% ethanol before primary serum displayed strong microglial LC1-ir (4+) but no neuronal staining (-) (Figure 6A and Figure 6C).
These data indicated that total dehydration was not necessary, that 30% ethanol for 15 min abolished neuronal staining, and that 10% ethanol did not. Immersion in 100% ethanol abolished neuronal staining and improved microglial staining; 100% acetone improved staining of microglial processes but did not eliminate neuronal staining. Either 30% ethanol alone or series DeRe maximized the microglia/neuron stain ratio; either was better than direct immersion in absolute ethanol.
The results with alcohols clearly showed the preponderance of microglial LC1-ir and the absence of neuronal staining in brain sections embedded in paraffin (exposed to ethanols in two steps). It was tempting to conclude that partial dehydration unmasked true LC1 epitopes in microglia and that neuron staining was unspecific. However, such conclusions required better evidence about the specificity of our immuno-reagents.
Staining Specificity
In pre-absorption controls for staining specificity, the primary antiserum is incubated with purified antigen to neutralize specific immunoglobulins before immu-nostaining; specific immunoreactivity is reduced or eliminated. To enhance the credibility of the results, it is important to maximize the sensitivity in these experiments. We used primary serum at 1:4K, the maximal dilution that still provided unambiguous neuron staining (2+). That is, if the purified antigen could not eliminate staining at this dilution, it never would. In addition, cryosections of GPAS-fixed brain were stained without DeRe, i.e., the protocol conducive to both microglial and neuronal staining (Figure 6B and Figure 6D).
As expected, pre-absorption of anti-LC1 serum (1:4K) with 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin did not diminish staining of neuronal nuclei or microglia (Figure 7A).
Pre-absorption with Purified Placental LC1. As shown in Table 2, pre-absorption of primary serum with placental LC1 at 1 µg/ml diminished microglial staining; 10 or 100 µg/ml totally eliminated microglial staining, but neuron staining was not reduced in any of these specimens (Figure 7B). Because the neuron staining could not be abolished by purified antigen, it should be defined as immunologically unspecific. Identical neuron-associated DAB reaction product also appeared when never-dehydrated cryosections were "stained" with normal rabbit serum.
|
The dose-dependent reduction in microglial LC1-ir produced by pre-absorption with purified LC1 indicated specific immunoreactivity. However, these data were not conclusive. The real antigen, a purified preparation of LC1 from human placenta, contained contaminating proteins. These contaminants would raise antibodies that could recognize homologues in other mammalian specimens and result in unwanted specific staining. One approach to solving this problem was to pre-absorb with immunologically pure LC1.
Pre-absorption with Recombinant LC1. The concept of immunological purity defines a protein preparation that has very low probability of containing contaminants related to contaminants in the original antigen preparation. Specifically, experiments were designed using LC1 protein synthesized in yeast transfected with the cDNA for human LC1. Regardless of the final purity of the recombinant LC1 (rLC1) in these preparations, all contaminants would be from yeast rather than from mammalian proteins. Although not absolutely certain, it is unlikely that the yeast proteins would neutralize immunoglobulins raised against contaminating proteins from human placenta.
For further assurance, we tested rLC1 from two quite different strains of transfected yeast, Saccharomyces diastaticus (
Solid-phase Pre-absorption The pre-absorption controls using yeast protein fractions enriched for rLC1 provided strong evidence that neuronal staining was unspecific. However, we were concerned that similar results regarding elimination of microglial staining would be observed if the rLC1 fraction simply destroyed the anti-LC1 immunoglobulins. Perhaps protease activity or other destructive/masking factors from yeast contaminated the rLC1 fraction.
To test this hypothesis, yeasts (fixed and permeabilized) were used as solid-phase substrates for immobilized antigen in a combined pre-absorption control and affinity-purification protocol (see Materials and Methods). Aliquots of anti-LC1 serum at 4 x working dilution (1:2K) were mixed with equal volumes of control and LC1 yeast. After 60 min for binding equilibration, the tubes were centrifuged and the supernatant used for immunostaining at a final dilution of 1:8K. Sera pre-absorbed with control (wild-type or parental) strains produced full undiminished LC1-ir (4+), whereas those pre-absorbed with recombinant yeast were weak to nil (+/-). Therefore, the pre-absorption results with intact yeast were identical to purified rLC1, but these data did not eliminate the possibility that the anti-LC1 was removed by lytic rather than immunospecific factors.
Affinity-purified Anti-LC1. If factors in the yeast had destroyed anti-LC1 immunoglobulins, then the recovery of immunoreactive IgGs from the yeast would be impossible. On the other hand, if the IgGs bound specifically to LC1 in the yeast, they would remain bound through repeated washing and could then be eluted and used to stain microglia. After repeated washing of the yeast, a single acid rinse released bound antibodies from the immobilized antigen. The acid rinse was immediately neutralized and used for immunohistochemistry. The solutions recovered from washed control yeast showed no LC1 immunoreactivity (-); those from rLC1 yeast stained microglia very well (3+). These results provided strong confirmation that the IgGs staining microglia recognize human LC1.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Immunochemistry of Lipocortin
As reviewed by
Our studies of variables that influence detection of LC1-ir have largely satisfied the criteria above. With appropriate tissue fixation, LC1-ir is stained with antisera raised against LC1 purified from different species, including hog and human. These polyclonal antisera are effective at 1:8000 dilution, they identify LC1-ir in identical cell types in both frozen and paraffin sections, and the staining is completely abolished by pre-incubation with purified LC1. Studies in kidney have shown that pathophysiological changes in levels of LC1-ir quantified in tissue sections corresponded precisely with levels measured from immunoblot (Western) analysis (
The lipocortin antigen has some unusual characteristics. For example, freezing tissues before fixation totally eliminates LC1-ir and fixation of LC1-ir requires acidic conditions. Dilute acid-alcohol preserves LC1-ir but it is diminished by more concentrated alcohols. Finally, partial dehydration is required for immunodetection. Therefore, preservation and detection of LC1-ir appear to be sensitive to pH and hydrophobicity.
Studies in other disciplines have reported physiological and physical chemical properties of LC1 that appear relevant to its unusual immunohistochemical characteristics. Although it is traditionally described as a soluble cytoplasmic protein, LC1 has unusual sedimentation and partitioning properties. Early studies showed that LC1 binds to and sediments with membranes and cytoskeleton in the presence of Ca++ and that it is released into the supernatant when cell homogenates are treated with Ca++ chelating agents (
We postulated that the influence of pH and alcohol on preservation and detection of LC1-ir was related to some or all of these physicochemical properties. However, preliminary attempts to test these properties directly yielded negative results. Extraction of brain slices with acidic chloroform-methanol for 30 min before GPAS fixation destroyed tissue integrity but only partially reduced LC1-ir (2+). Incubation of brain slices in PBS + EDTA (5 mM) for 2 hr before fixation caused no detectable diminution or translocation of LC1-ir (4+).
Lipocortin in the Central Nervous System
There is little question regarding the presence of LC1 in rat central nervous system (CNS). It was detected by both immunoblotting and PLA2 inhibitory activity (
Several questions regarding LC1-ir in the CNS cannot be resolved at present. Both species and age differences are apparent. In some cases the immunoreactivity is robust. With current antisera, an LC1-positive midline raphe is detected in the floor plate of vertebrates ranging from primates to zebrafish (
In other cases LC1-ir appears elusive. Strong LC1-ir is detected in mouse microglia in culture (
In contrast, an overabundance of LC1-positive cell types has been reported in rat CNS. LC1-ir was localized to GFAP-positive reactive astrocytes in lesioned rat cerebellum cryosectioned without fixation or cryoprotection (
In other cases, several minor problems appeared to multiply. Neutral formalin preserves LC1-ir in surface cells exposed to high levels of fixative, leading to staining of ependymal cells (
pH and Fixation
Evidence that acidic fixation conditions favor preservation of LC1 and several other small, soluble protein antigens leaves two histological points open to reconsideration. First, the tradition of fixing tissue near physiological pH may be irrelevant, since the goal is to fix/immobilize/denature the biological molecules. It may be helpful to use conditions that change the charges and conformations of these molecules and inhibit their activities. Second, although the reactions of formaldehyde with collagen are accelerated at pH 7<9<11 (
Because both FPAS and GPAS provide excellent preservation, both have been useful in investigations of true LC1-ir localization. It is worth mention, however, that the preservation achieved with GPAS or FPAS is not equivalent for all antigens. GPAS significantly enhances preservation of phosphotyrosine (PY-ir) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) (
In summary, the requirements for fixation and immunolocalization of LC1 are specific and unusual. A variety of aldehydes are acceptable for preserving LC1-ir, hydrophobic and acid environments expose critical epitopes, and LC1-ir is very sensitive to freezing. Attention to these details may help to resolve conflicting data regarding the tissue and cellular distribution of LC1 and may contribute to future investigation of its functions.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Supported by NIH grants NS32660, HD15052, and DK39261, and by ONR FEL Center N14-94-1-1023.
We thank Natalie Ahn and Stanley Cohen for antisera, Bong Hyun Chung and Yuko Giga-Hama for recombinant yeast, Michael Bienkowski for unpublished data on LC1 purification, and David Lovinger and Elizabeth Tyler for brain slices.
Received for publication December 20, 1995; accepted October 17, 1996.
|
Literature Cited |
|---|
|
TopSummaryIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionLiterature Cited |
|---|
Ahn NG, Teller DC, Bienkowski MJ, McMullen BA, Lipkin EW, de Haen C (1988) Sedimentation equilibrium analysis of five lipocorti-related phospholipase A2 inhibitors from human placenta. Evidence against a mechanistically relevant association between enzyme and inhibitor. J Biol Chem 263:18657-18663
Berod A, Hartman BK, Pujol JF (1981) Importance of fixation in immunohistochemistry: use of formaldehyde solutions at variable pH for the localization of tyrosine hydroxylase. J Histochem Cytochem 29:844-850[Abstract]
Bowes JH, Cates CW (1966) The reaction of glutaraldehyde with proteins and other biological materials. J R Microsc Soc 85:193-200
DiRosa M, Flower RJ, Hirata F, Parente L, Russo Marie F (1984) Anti-phospholipase proteins. Prostaglandins 28:441-442[Medline]
Eberhard DA, Brown MD, VandenBerg SR (1994) Alterations of annexin expression in pathological neuronal and glial reactions. Immunohistochemical localization of annexins I, II (p 36 and p11 subunits IV and VI in the human hippocampus Am J Pathol 145:640-649
Elderfield AJ, Newcombe J, Bolton C, Flower RJ (1992) Lipocortins (annexins) 1, 2, 4, and 5 are increased in the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 39:91-100[Medline]
Fava RA, Cohen S (1984) Isolation of a calcium-dependent 35-kilodalton substrate for the epidermal growth factor receptor/kinase from A-431 cells. J Biol Chem 259:2636-2645
Fedoroff S, McKanna JA (1994) Lipocortin 1 is expressed in microglia and their progenitor cells in cultures. Mol Biol Cell 5:228a
Flower RJ, Rothwell NJ (1994) Lipocortin 1: cellular mechanisms and clinical relevance. Trends Pharmacol Sci 15:71-76[Medline]
Genge BR, Wu LN, Adkisson HD, Wuthier RE (1991) Matrix vesicle annexins exhibit proteolipid-like properties. Selective partitioning into lipophilic solvents under acidic conditions. J Biol Chem 266:10678-10685
Haigler HT, Mangili JA, Gao Y, Jones J, Horseman ND (1992) Identification and characterization of columbid annexin Icp37. Insights into the evolution of annexin 1 phosphorylation sites J Biol Chem 267:19123-19129
Hamre KM, Chepenik KP, Goldowitz D (1995) The annexins: specific markers of midline structures and sensory neurons in the developing murine central nervous system. J Comp Neurol 352:421-435[Medline]
Harris RC, McKanna JA, Akai Y, Jacobson HR, DuBois RN, Breyer MD (1994) Cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with the macula densa of rat kidney and increases with salt restriction. J Clin Invest 94:2504-2510
Larsson LI (1988) Immunocytochemistry: Theory and Practice. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press
Lovinger DM, Merritt A, Reyes D (1994) Involvement of N- and non-N-type calcium channels in synaptic transmission at corticostriatal synapses. Neuroscience 62:31-40[Medline]
McKanna JA (1993a) Lipocortin 1 immunoreactivity identifies microglia in adult rat brain. J Neurosci Res 36:491-500[Medline]
McKanna JA (1993b) Primitive glial compartments in the floor plate of mammalian embryos: distinct progenitors of adult astrocytes and microglia support the notoplate hypothesis. Prosp Dev Neurobiol 1:245-255
McKanna JA, Casagrande VA (1994) Lipocortin 1 and phosphotyrosine identify microglia in adult and embryonic rat CNS. Soc Neurosci Abstr 20:872
McKanna JA, Chuncharunee A, Munge KA, Breyer JA, Cohen S, Harris RC (1992) Localization of p35 (annexin I, lipocortin I) in normal adult rat kidney and during recovery from ischemia. J Cell Physiol 153:467-476[Medline]
McKanna JA, Cohen S (1989) The EGF receptor kinase substrate p35 in the floor plate of the embryonic rat CNS. Science 243:1477-1479
McKanna JA, Federoff S (1996) Development of microglia in situ and in cultures. In Ling EA, Tan CK, eds. Topical Issues in Microglia Research. Singapore Neuroscience Assn, 21-42
Mullens L, Marriott DR, Young KA, Tannahill L, Lightman SL, Wilkin GP (1994) Up-regulation of lipocortin-1 and its mRNA in reactive astrocytes in kainate-lesioned rat cerebellum. J Neuroimmunol 50:25-33[Medline]
Myatt L, Hirth J, Everson WV (1992) Changes in annexin (lipocortin) content in human amnion and chorion at parturition. J Cell Biochem 50:363-373[Medline]
Nam SW, Kim BM, Chung BH, Kang DO, Ahn JS (1994) Expression and secretion of human lipocortin 1 by promoter and signal sequence of STA1 from Saccharomyces diastaticus. Biotech Lett 16:897-902
Perretti M, Ahluwalia A, Harris JG, Goulding NJ, Flower RJ (1993) Lipocortin-1 fragments inhibit neutrophil accumulation and neutrophil-dependent edema in the mouse. A qualitative comparison with an anti-CD 11b monoclonal antibody J Immunol 151:4306-4314
Raynal P, Pollard HB (1994) Annexins: the problem of asessing the biological role for a gene family of multifunctional calcium- and phospholipid-binding proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1197:63-93[Medline]
Regnouf F, Rendon A, Pradel LA (1991) Biochemical characterization of annexins I and II isolated from pig nervous tissue. J Neurochem 56:1985-1996[Medline]
Rothwell NJ, Relton JK (1993) Involvement of interleukin-1 and lipocortin-1 in ischaemic brain damage. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 5:178-198[Medline]
Sakai M, Zhang M-Z, McKanna JA, Harris RC (1995) Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) increases in response to acute renal injury and is expressed during renal development. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:988
Sakata T, Iwagami S, Tsuruta Y, Teraoka H, Hojo K, Suzuki S, Sato K, Suzuki R (1990) The role of lipocortin I in macrophage-mediated immunosuppression in tumor-bearing mice. J Immunol 145:387-396[Abstract]
Streit WJ, Kincaid-Colton CA (1995) The brain's immune system. Sci Am 273:54-61[Medline]
Strijbos PJ, Tilders FJ, Carey F, Forder R, Rothwell NJ (1991) Localization of immunoreactive lipocortin-1 in the brain and pituitary gland of the rat. Effects of adrenalectomy, dexamethasone and colchicine treatment. Brain Res 553:249-260[Medline]
Tohda H, Okada H, Giga-Hama Y, Okayama H, Kumagai H (1994) A copy-number-controlled expression vector for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene 150:275-280[Medline]
Williams AE, van Dam AM, Man-A-Hing WK, Berkenbosch F, Eikelenboom P, Fraser H (1994) Cytokines, prostaglandins and lipocortin-1 are present in the brains of scrapie-infected mice. Brain Res 654:200-206[Medline]
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Rao, M.-Z. Zhang, M. Zhao, H. Cai, R. C. Harris, M. D. Breyer, and C.-M. Hao Lithium treatment inhibits renal GSK-3 activity and promotes cyclooxygenase 2-dependent polyuria Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): F642 - F649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-Z. Zhang, P. S. Lopez, J. A. McKanna, and R. C. Harris Regulation of Cyclooxygenase Expression by Vasopressin in Rat Renal Medulla Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1402 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M.-Z. Zhang, W. Mai, C. Li, S.-y. Cho, C. Hao, G. Moeckel, R. Zhao, I. Kim, J. Wang, H. Xiong, et al. PKHD1 protein encoded by the gene for autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease associates with basal bodies and primary cilia in renal epithelial cells PNAS, February 24, 2004; 101(8): 2311 - 2316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-Z. Zhang, S.-w. Wang, H. Cheng, Y. Zhang, J. A. McKanna, and R. C. Harris Regulation of renal cortical cyclooxygenase-2 in young rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): F881 - F888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-Z. Zhang, C.-M. Hao, M. D. Breyer, R. C. Harris, and J. A. McKanna Mineralocorticoid regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in rat renal medulla Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): F509 - F516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-Z. Zhang, R. C. Harris, and J. A. McKanna Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in rat renal cortex by adrenal glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids PNAS, December 21, 1999; 96(26): 15280 - 15285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Traverso, H. C. Christian, J. F. Morris, and J. C. Buckingham Lipocortin 1 (Annexin 1): A Candidate Paracrine Agent Localized in Pituitary Folliculo-Stellate Cells Endocrinology, September 1, 1999; 140(9): 4311 - 4319. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. McKanna, M.-Z. Zhang, J.-L. Wang, H.-F. Cheng, and R. C. Harris Constitutive expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in rat vas deferens Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 1998; 275(1): R227 - R233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.-Z. Zhang, J.-L. Wang, H.-F. Cheng, R. C. Harris, and J. A. McKanna Cyclooxygenase-2 in rat nephron development Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): F994 - F1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||