doi:10.1369/jhc.5A6646.2005
Volume 54 (1): 31-38, 2006 Copyright ©The Histochemical Society, Inc. Genetic Immunization: A New Monoclonal Antibody for the Detection of BCL-6 Protein in Paraffin Sections
Monoclonal Antibodies Unit (J-FG,LM,EL,GR), Histology and Immunochemistry Unit (LS-V), Protein Technology Unit (SR-C), Biotechnology Program, Molecular Pathology Program (J-FG,M-AP), Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain Correspondence to: Giovanna Roncador, Monoclonal Antibodies Unit, Biotechnology Program, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (Spanish National Cancer Centre), C/Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, E-28029, Madrid, Spain. E-mail: groncador{at}cnio.es
Genetic immunization can be combined with hybridoma technology to generate high-affinity monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). A new anti-BCL-6 MAb (GI191E/A8) was produced by cloning full-length BCL-6 cDNA into a eukaryotic vector and delivering this into mouse epidermis using a helium gene gun. A comparative study was made of the specificity and the effects of formalin fixation on immunohistochemistry quality of GI191E/A8 and two other anti-BCL-6 MAbs. To evaluate its possible application to differential diagnosis of lymphomas, two tissue microarrays (89 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and 24 B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cases) were stained with GI191E/A8 and another anti-BCL-6 MAb produced by conventional means. Using GI191E/A8, the detection of BCL-6 protein was significantly increased, and its specificity was independent of formalin-fixation time. Using automatic quantified analysis, the correlation between the two anti-BCL-6 MAbs tested was identical in cases with overexpression or absence of BCL-6. In cases with intermediate BCL-6 protein expression, detection with GI191E/A8 was more sensitive. A significant association of higher BCL-6 expression and longer median overall survival times in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas was found. Using conventionally produced MAbs in the same patient group, the association was not significant. (J Histochem Cytochem 54:3138, 2006)
Key Words: BCL-6 formalin fixed genetic immunization monoclonal antibody lymphomas
DURING THE PAST DECADE, genetic immunization (GI) using plasmid DNA containing the gene for an antigen of interest has been intensively investigated with a view to developing it as a new form of vaccination (Gurunathan et al. 2000
One of the main advantages of GI is the fact that proteins are synthesized in vivo, resulting in production of proteins in their natural conformation. Therefore, GI-produced MAbs are mainly high affinity and recognize the native form of the protein (Barry et al. 1994
However, the successful application of this technique for generating MAbs has been hindered by technical problems such as low efficiency, with the consequence that very few hybridomas have been produced. This problem has been solved by giving mice that have previously been genetically immunized a final boost, using purified protein (Costagliola et al. 1998
BCL-6 is a zinc-finger transcriptional repressor required for germinal-center (GC) formation, Ab-affinity maturation, and T-helper-2-mediated responses (Ye et al. 1997 The aim of our study was to demonstrate that GI is a viable and effective alternative method for production of MAbs for immunohistochemistry (IHC) on paraffin sections. For this purpose, we generated two anti-BCL-6 MAbs; one produced using GI and the second using glutathione S-transferase (GST) recombinant protein produced in bacteria. The specificity of the new GI-produced MAb was tested on paraffin sections using the pressure-cooking method of antigen retrieval and a variety of different buffers. Furthermore, the effect of formalin fixation on GI191E/A8 IHC quality was compared with two other anti-BCL-6 MAbs. To confirm its possible application as a diagnostic marker, we examined BCL-6 protein expression using tissue microarrays (TMAs) for DLBCL and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), which are common examples of BCL-6-positive and -negative lymphoproliferative neoplasms, respectively. The results obtained using GI191E/A8 and ST42B/H7 MAbs were compared.
Mice BALB/c mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and handled in laminar-flow isolation hoods in a barrier facility in the Animal Facility Unit of the Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO). All animal experiments were performed under the experimental protocol approved by the Institutional Committee for Care and Use of Animals, CEUCA no. 001/02.
Plasmid DNAs The ability of the constructed pCMV-BCL6 plasmid to mediate in vitro expression of BCL-6 was confirmed by calcium phosphate-mediated transient transfection of HEK-293T cells (American Type Culture Collection; Rockville, MD). Before immunization, DNA was diluted in pyrogen-free water to appropriate concentrations (2 µg/µl) for the preparation of Gene Gun (GG) cartridges.
Immunization and Production of MAbs by GI
Mice were anesthetized with isoflourane gas for shaving off abdominal fur and for all immunization times. The helium-powered GG was used at 400 psi (2758 kPa) to deliver one shot to the inguino-abdominal skin of six mice. Immunizations were repeated five times at 14-day intervals, and serum samples were collected by puncture of the retro-orbital plexus after 40 and 70 days. Lesion discomfort or pain was not observed in the experimental mice after GG-immunization. Mouse serum was tested on frozen tonsil sections by IHC, showing that all mice developed strong and specific Ab responses. The last boost was performed using HEK-293T cells transfected with pCMV-BCL6 plasmid. Cells washed and resuspended in PBS (pH 7) were injected on day 80 (4 x107 cells in 400 µl) into the mouse's intraperitoneal cavity (Nagata et al. 2003
Western Blotting and Cell Lines
Tissue Samples To study the effect of formalin fixation on the quality of BCL-6 IHC, two samples of normal tonsil were cut into five pieces. Four pieces of each were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Panreac; Barcelona, Spain) for different times (12, 24, and 48 hr and 1 week, respectively), whereas the fifth piece was fixed for 1 hr in B5 fixative (Panreac). All samples were then processed and embedded in paraffin.
Antigen Retrieval
Source of Antibodies
WB study was performed using the GI191E/A8 MAbs (diluted 1:2 in PBS with 10% fetal calf serum) and anti-
Antibody Purification
Antibody-Affinity Assay
Immunostaining Techniques Before staining paraffin-embedded sections, endogenous peroxidase was blocked, the slides were incubated for 40 min with the primary MAb, washed with PBS, and the immunodetection was performed with biotinylated anti-mouse secondary Abs (25 min), followed by peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (25 min) and diaminobenzidine chromogen as substrate. The immunostaining was performed using the Techmate 500 (Dako-Cytomation; Tucson, AZ) automatic immunostaining device. Reactives were supplied by DakoCytomation. Incubations either omitting the specific Ab or containing unrelated Abs were used as a control of the technique.
Analysis of BCL-6 Protein by TMAs and Quantification of BCL-6 Protein Expression After immunostaining, TMAs were scanned and analyzed using the BLISS system (Bacus Laboratories, Inc.; Lombard, IL), which employs a three-charge-coupled device (CCD) red-green-blue (RGB) sensor optically coupled to a microscope, following the manufacturer's recommendations. Multiple x40 images were scanned for each core, and the stored images were quantified using TMAscore v.2.0 image analysis software (Bacus Laboratories, Inc). For scoring the level of expression of BCL-6 (percentage of immunostained area) in the DLBCL and B-CLL TMAs, the threshold values for all the quantitative measures and for the different TMAs and Abs evaluated were adjusted accordingly. All measurements were made using equal threshold values.
Survival Analyses
The anti-BCL-6 GI191E/A8 MAb was initially validated by comparing WB data and IHC on cytocentrifuge preparations of human cell lines (Figure 1 ). Tissue lysates of tonsil and thymus, Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines (Ramos, AKATA, and Mutu-1), and DLBCL cell lines (KARPAS-422 and DB) reveal a clear 95-kDa band of BCL-6 protein. BCL-6 protein was not detected by WB or IHC studies in the Toledo (DLBCL) and REH (acute lymphoblastic leukemia) cell lines.
BCL-6 protein expression was then studied by IHC on paraffin-embedded tissues with the GI191E/A8 MAb and compared with other anti-BCL-6 MAbs produced by conventional means (ST42B/H7 and PG-6Bp). Positive staining of nuclei was seen in normal GC B-cells with all three MAbs. Although the specificity was similar for the three MAbs, the intensity of staining was significantly increased using the new GI191E/A8 MAb, as shown in Figure 2C .
The results of the comparison between the pressure-cooking methods of antigen retrieval using five different tonsil samples, buffers, and/or enzyme digestion with proteinase K for the anti-BCL-6 MAbs dilutions are shown in Table 1. Optimal results were obtained using citrate buffer (pH 6.5) followed by 10-min proteinase K enzyme digestion for all anti-BCL-6 MAbs tested. We found that the use of proteinase K as an additional step in the antigen retrieval method helped to decrease background staining.
The effects of formalin and B5 fixation on BCL-6 immunostaining are shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. Because the results achieved comparing the BCL-6 clones PG-B6p and ST42B/H7 were extremely similar, only the results of clone ST42B/H7 are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 , and Figure 5.
For all three MAbs tested, the best results were achieved after 24 hr of formalin fixation (Table 2 and Figures 2C2D), the standard method used in most laboratories (Werner et al. 2000 In the case of ST42B/H7, under- and overfixation (12 and 48 hr, respectively) drastically decreased the BCL-6 signal, culminating in almost complete loss of signal after 1 week of fixation (Figures 2B, 2F, 2H). The B5-fixed sample showed weak BCL-6 staining (Figure 2J). In the case of GI191E/A8, under- and overfixation or B5 fixation only slightly decreased the staining, indicating that its specificity is less dependent on formalin-fixation times and type of fixative used (Figures 2A, 2E, 2G, 2I).
To evaluate the affinity of our MAbs, we performed an Ab-affinity assay using an ELISA assay. The affinities of the MAbs were estimated by reacting them with BCL-6 protein captured on the solid phase followed by OD measurement at 405 nm. Clone GI191E/A8 gave an OD 405-nm reading of 1.0 at 6.25 nM, whereas ST42B/H7 yielded a value of 1.0 at 100 nM (Table 3). Thus, the affinity of clone GI191E/A8 was
The study of anti-BCL-6 MAbs immunostaining on tumor samples was performed using TMA analysis for DLBCL and B-CLL and analyzed using the BLISS system. As expected, all B-CLL cases staining with both MAbs were BCL-6 negative or displayed only faint nuclear expression in scattered cells (BCL-6 values ranging from 0 to 0.88%), showing that the staining was specific for BCL-6 protein and that similar epitopes were not recognized (data not shown). The comparative study of BCL-6 expression in TMA analysis of DLBCL cases (Figure 3) revealed a close correlation between the ST42B/H7 and GI191E/A8 MAbs (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.90). The majority of samples expressed a strong nuclear signal in most tumoral cells (values from 0.01 to 85.1%, Figure 3). Although the detection of BCL-6 protein was identical in those cases where BCL-6 was highly overexpressed or absent, in the cases where BCL-6 expression was intermediate, its detection with GI191E/A8 MAb was more sensitive (Figure 3). Moreover, the average percentage of BCL-6 signal significantly increased when GI191E/A8 MAb was used (15.11 for GI191E/A8 vs 8.5 for ST42B/H7).
Figure 4
and Figure 5
illustrate the application of BCL-6 protein expression (using MAb clones ST42B/H7 and GI191E/A8) as an independent predictor of OS in DLBCL. Significant association of higher BCL-6 expression (as measured using GI191E/A8, Figure 4) and longer median OS times in DLBCL (log-rank test: p=0.0349) was found, as previously described by other groups (Lossos et al. 2001
MAbs and IHC techniques on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections have become indispensable diagnostic and prognostic tools in the management of lymphoproliferative neoplasms. GI has been used mainly to obtain MAbs, which recognizes the native form of the protein but, as described here, GI can also be used as an effective alternative method for the production of MAbs for IHC on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. This technique is much faster and less expensive, compared with conventionally produced MAbs. Normally, protein production and purification take from 1 to 4 months and pose significant difficulties in some cases. GI does not require protein for immunization or for the screening procedure. We demonstrate that GI191E/A8 presents superior sensitivity, and relative independence from factors such as fixation procedures allows better detection of BCL-6 protein in paraffin-embedded tissue. Low MAb sensitivity associated with low protein expression levels and incorrect tissue fixation procedures are the elements most commonly associated with pitfalls in routine IHC diagnosis. However, more studies with other antigens are necessary to demonstrate that GI is better suited for the production of MAbs for the detection of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded antigens. MAbs are invaluable tools that have helped to extend our knowledge of biological systems for over two decades. The development of alternative methods for production of MAbs such as GI is likely to be important for meeting the increasing demand for MAbs for diagnosis, drug development, research, and therapy. GI is an important platform for the production of MAbs, allowing accurate and sensitive detection and screening of proteins in paraffin-embedded tissue samples and providing a link between genomic- and proteomic-derived data.
This work was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (BIO2000-0275-C02/01-/02, SAF2001-0060), Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (CAM 08.1/0011/2001.1), Spain. José-Francisco Garcia is the recipient of a grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (FP-2001-0977), Spain. We would like to thank Jackie Cordell, Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Oxford, for providing us with the NS-1 myeloma cell line (P3/NS1/1-Ag4-1). We also extend our appreciation to the staff of the CNIO Tumour Bank for their efficient provision of tumor simples and to Juan Fernando Martínez Leal, Carmen Blanco Aparicio, and Jesús M. Fominaya Gutiérrez of the CNIO Experimental Therapies group for advice. Further thanks are due to all members of the CNIO Animal Facility and Immunohistochemistry Unit for their technical support.
Received for publication February 7, 2005; accepted July 11, 2005
Barry MA, Barry ME, Johnston SA (1994) Production of monoclonal antibodies by genetic immunization. Biotechniques 16:616618, 620[Medline] Chambers RS, Johnston SA (2003) High-level generation of polyclonal antibodies by genetic immunization. Nat Biotechnol 21:10881092[CrossRef][Medline] Costagliola S, Rodien P, Many MC, Ludgate M, Vassart G (1998) Genetic immunization against the human thyrotropin receptor causes thyroiditis and allows production of monoclonal antibodies recognizing the native receptor. J Immunol 160:14581465 Erber WN, Pinching AJ, Mason DY (1984) Immunocytochemical detection of T and B cell populations in routine blood smears. Lancet 1:10421046[Medline] Falini B, Mason DY (2002) Proteins encoded by genes involved in chromosomal alterations in lymphoma and leukemia: clinical value of their detection by immunocytochemistry. Blood 99:409426 Garcia JF, Camacho FI, Morente M, Fraga M, Montalban C, Alvaro T, Bellas C, et al. (2003) Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells harbor alterations in the major tumor suppressor pathways and cell-cycle checkpoints: analyses using tissue microarrays. Blood 101:681689 Gregory CD, Rowe M, Rickinson AB (1990) Different Epstein-Barr virus-B cell interactions in phenotypically distinct clones of a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line. J Gen Virol 71(Pt 7):14811495 Gurunathan S, Klinman DM, Seder RA (2000) DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization. Annu Rev Immunol 18:927974[CrossRef][Medline] Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, Lister TA, et al. (2000) The World Health Organization classification of neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meetingAirlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. Hematol J 1:5366[CrossRef][Medline] Kallioniemi OP, Wagner U, Kononen J, Sauter G (2001) Tissue microarray technology for high-throughput molecular profiling of cancer. Hum Mol Genet 10:657662 Kilpatrick KE, Cutler T, Whitehorn E, Drape RJ, Macklin MD, Witherspoon SM, Singer S, et al. (1998) Gene gun delivered DNA-based immunizations mediate rapid production of murine monoclonal antibodies to the Flt-3 receptor. Hybridoma 17:569576[Medline] Kilpatrick KE, Danger DP, Hull-Ryde EA, Dallas W (2000) High-affinity monoclonal antibodies to PED/PEA-15 generated using 5 µg of DNA. Hybridoma 19:297302 Kilpatrick KE, Kerner S, Dixon EP, Hutchins JT, Parham JH, Condreay JP, Pahel G (2002) In vivo expression of a GST-fusion protein mediates the rapid generation of affinity matured monoclonal antibodies using DNA-based immunizations. Hybrid Hybridomics 21:237243[CrossRef][Medline] Krasemann S, Jurgens T, Bodemer W (1999) Generation of monoclonal antibodies against prion proteins with an unconventional nucleic acid-based immunization strategy. J Biotechnol 73:119129[CrossRef][Medline] Lossos IS, Jones CD, Warnke R, Natkunam Y, Kaizer H, Zehnder JL, Tibshirani R, et al. (2001) Expression of a single gene, BCL-6, strongly predicts survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 98:945951 Mason DY, Cordell JL, Pulford KAF (1983) Production of monoclonal antibodies for immunocytochemical use. In Bullock GR, Petrusz P, eds. Techniques in Immunocytochemistry. London, Academic Press, 175216 Nagata S, Salvatore G, Pastan I (2003) DNA immunization followed by a single boost with cells: a protein-free immunization protocol for production of monoclonal antibodies against the native form of membrane proteins. J Immunol Methods 280:5972[CrossRef][Medline] Sanchez-Aguilera A, Delgado J, Camacho FI, Sanchez-Beato M, Sanchez L, Montalban C, Fresno MF, et al. (2004) Silencing of the p18INK4c gene by promoter hypermethylation in Reed-Sternberg cells in Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood 103:23512357 Schmolke S, Tacke M, Schmitt U, Engel AM, Ofenloch-Haehnle B (1998) Identification of hepatitis G virus particles in human serum by E2-specific monoclonal antibodies generated by DNA immunization. J Virol 72:45414545 Takada K, Horinouchi K, Ono Y, Aya T, Osato T, Takahashi M, Hayasaka S (1991) An Epstein-Barr virus-producer line Akata: establishment of the cell line and analysis of viral DNA. Virus Genes 5:147156[CrossRef][Medline] Ulivieri C, Burroni D, Telford JL, Baldari CT (1996) Generation of a monoclonal antibody to a defined portion of the Helicobacter pylori vacuolating cytotoxin by DNA immunization. J Biotechnol 51:191194[CrossRef][Medline] Werner M, Chott A, Fabiano A, Battifora H (2000) Effect of formalin tissue fixation and processing on immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol 24:10161019[CrossRef][Medline] Ye BH, Cattoretti G, Shen Q, Zhang J, Hawe N, de Waard R, Leung C, et al. (1997) The BCL-6 proto-oncogene controls germinal-centre formation and Th2-type inflammation. Nat Genet 16:161170[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||